saying bounty is wrong
So this whole discussion about “bounties” in the NFL has me scratching my head a little.
And I know the game has changed from when good ole Ronnie Lott was leveling running backs from his safety position.
But.
All this talk has me kind of wanting to tell the Media to find a different word than bounty.
Bounty suggests I am going to catch & kill someone … and it implies something illegal has been done.
By NFL “incentive” rules this whole thing being discussed may be illegal.
But by ‘good natured locker room team building bet’ rules … they were placed on legal hits.
So <in my little amateur world>.
I played.
I liked it.
I liked “putting a hurt on someone.”
I didn’t like “hurting someone.”
Nuance?
You bet.
But an important nuance.
People like football for a lot of reasons <players and spectators>, and one of the biggest is because of the hits <the violence>.
Making someone feel it when they were hit.
People may not like talking about it but if you are real about it with yourself … it’s kind of a fact.
There is some level of satisfaction that the game is being played right … and being played well … when this happens.
Once again.
By players and spectators.
That said.
Football players like the game for a lot of reasons but they play the game because they like to hit people … hard … it is a physical game for physical men.
They aren’t <I would say the majority> out to hurt someone … like in a debilitating hurt.
They just want someone to feel it when they hit them.
They want someone shaking their head a little after they hit them.
They want people to know that they can play the game … hard.
Look.
I didn’t even come close to playing at this level and I know I did.
Should there be locker room bets or payouts for ‘the big hits’?
Whew.
Gotta say.
I don’t have any problems with that.
Should players have their head on a swivel? Sure. But they already do. They have to.
For god’s sake there are 250 pound men with world class speed running around faster than most high school track members can run (just trying to put some perspective on it for the average Joe) trying to hit you to either push you out of the way <to another zip code>or push you into the turf <two feet at minimum>.
I think placing the word “bounty” into this media game suggests that most players are out to hurt other players.
And that I don’t buy <if that is what you are selling>.
Putting a hurt ON someone? I will buy that.
Because that is the game.
Bounty is a bad bad word.
And it creates a media storm undeserving of what is probably actually happening.
I am sure someone is going to pay for this.
But I think it’s silly.
Let the boys play the game they are being paid to play.
On the side <in the locker room> good natured bets are part of what builds the camaraderie.
Get over it.
Or play <or watch> the synchronized swimming league.
(although I bet they have side bets too)
There is a big difference between a good hit and trying to hurt someone with illegal hits, watch the ’09 NFC championship game. c’mon you are a Taint’s fan for sure… the hit on Kurt Warner after the interception? those are disgusting, disgraceful to the real players that play the game correctly.
yeah. i guessed i was gonna take a hit on this one (pun intended). and, no, i am not a saints fan. illegal hits … and purposefully trying to injure someone should be punished. no debate. but it is a physical game where, given the opportunity, some very large men are paid to put a pretty big hurt on you. an end coming off the edge free and clear is going to bring the hammer down … and if he does it legally, and in the locker room he gets a helmet sticker (oops … cash) … i honestly don’t have an issue with it. i just had a conversation with a friend of mine. i am not a pro athlete but i know a number of them. i do not know one professional who has any desire, or intent, to actually injure another player. it is a tough game for tough men who play tough. but purposefully injure another player? i just don’t see it. well. except for a fringe few who probably don’t belong in the game anyway.