Enlightened Conflict

vaccinations

January 5th, 2012

Ok.

This is gonna be one of those discussions that makes you scratch your head. Time magazine had this article about pediatricians “firing families” because the kids have decided to not have vaccination shots (measles, whooping cough, mumps, polio, etc.).

Ok.

First. This was an odd article.

It focused on the pediatricians (because the doctors didn’t want at-risk patients being exposed). Regardless. It focused on the doctors.

Second. What I really want to know is … what the fuck the parents are thinking.

C’mon.

Why wouldn’t you vaccinate your child?

A factoid.

30% of all children have skipped at least some of the recommended shots.

Say what?!?  Why would any parent do this? (because this isn’t some child throwing a tantrum saying no).

I don’t get it. And I do research some of the crap I write about and even with that I cannot come up with a viable rationale or even a random statistic explaining it (or at least anything that would make any logical fact-driven sense).

So here are some things I think about.

Maybe because the risk of childhood death has diminished so significantly BECAUSE of vaccination usage it is also largely out of mind ….which (in this wacky world of ours) leads a growing number of Americans to worry about what is in fact a much lesser risk – the ill effects of vaccines.

This is a scary double edged sword.

The first is ‘short memory.’

Sure. Each generation is doomed to make the mistakes of past generations (i.e., its no longer a problem so I don’t have to worry about it).

The second is focusing on the wrong things (and that could possibly be driven by the fact that people pay attention to scare tactics – bad news – rather than good news).

The only other thing I can think of is lethargy.

Or some point of view based on ‘there is no longer an issue so my child doesn’t need it’ point of view.  Either is stupid.

Really stupid.

And if it is indicative of the way people think we have some real issues.

Here is a real issue.

1 in 10 American parents surveyed (750 in the study) reject or delay at least one vaccine recommended in the standard vaccination schedule.

Wow.

That’s 10% for those folks not good at math. I was really stunned at that number. And it would be easy to suggest that health providers/ doctors should do a better job at educating patients … but I struggle with making them solely responsible for what I actually believe is ‘personal responsibility’ (or adult responsibility … or parent responsibility … or, even bigger, social responsibility).

Let’s focus. This is ALL about personal responsibility.

This isn’t a religious debate like creation and intelligent design or even pro-life.

This is a challenge to health science that crosses party, class, and religious lines. And I imagine it is possible that this is partly a reaction to some pharmaceutical company PR mistakes and public relations missteps in general which have encouraged a general distrust of experts.

But it is also a product of the era of instant communication and easy access to information. The doubters and deniers are empowered by the Internet (online, nobody knows you’re not a doctor) and helped by the mainstream media which has an interest in pumping up bad science to create a “debate” and distrust … where there should be none.

Thanks to the internet everyone can be their own medical investigator/expert.

There are anti-vaccine Web sites, Facebook groups, email alerts, and lobbying organizations and even politicians share misinformation and fuel anxiety in their desire to get votes.

What this means is that the exceptions (the rare occasions that something bad does happen) take on exponential proportions online.

But.

Consider this.

In certain parts of the US, vaccination rates have dropped so low that occurrences of some children’s diseases are approaching pre-vaccine levels for the first time ever. And the number of people who choose not to vaccinate their children (so-called philosophical exemptions are available in about 20 states, including Pennsylvania, Texas, and much of the West) continues to rise.

In states where such opting out is allowed, 2.6 percent of parents did so last year, up from 1 percent in 1991, according to the CDC.

In some communities, like California’s affluent Marin County, just north of San Francisco, non-vaccination rates are approaching 6 percent (counter intuitively the higher rates of non-vaccination often correspond with higher levels of education and wealth).

Ok.

All that may not sound like much, but a recent study by the Los Angeles Times indicates that the impact can be devastating. The Times found that even though only about 2 percent of California’s kindergartners are unvaccinated (10,000 kids, or about twice the number as in 1997), they tend to be clustered, disproportionately increasing the risk of an outbreak of such largely eradicated diseases as measles, mumps, and whooping cough.

The clustering means almost 10 percent of elementary schools statewide may already be at risk.

Unvaccinated children are 23 times more likely to get whooping cough, a highly contagious bacterial disease that causes violent coughing and is potentially lethal to infants.

In an issue of the journal Pediatrics, Jason Glanz, an epidemiologist at Kaiser’s Institute for Health Research, revealed that the number of reported whooping cough cases jumped from 1,000 in 1976 to 26,000 in 2004.

I use whooping cough simply as an example that a disease that vaccines made rare is making a comeback.

Next example.

The #2 most refused vaccine for children? The seasonal flu shot at 76%.

Except for New Jersey, flu vaccine is not required for school entry. While the CDC and AAP recommend annual flu vaccine, it is never included in the national immunization survey done annually by the CDC. While flu shots should be routine, just as important as those required for school entry, and universally accepted by parents just like the other childhood immunizations, parents opt to skip flu vaccine for themselves and their kids for no really good reason. Of all the vaccine-preventable diseases, we see influenza (aka “the flu”) every winter and we see people (particularly the very young and very old) die every year from it.

While it drives me crazy to think that parents are keeping vaccinations from children for a variety of reasons let’s get some facts out there.

The Institute of Medicine has also poured over 1000 articles on vaccine safety and published a comprehensive report in August 2011 that should reassure families about the safety of vaccinations.

So despite some of the online “scare stories” … vaccinations benefit our youth … and protect a generation to be happy & healthy.

And the danger from this growing sense that ‘vaccinations are bad’?

As an example there have been about 10,000 cases and 10 infant deaths from whooping cough in California, and at last count—198 cases of measles in the U.S.—more cases than we have seen in over 15 years.

Bottom line.

Childhood diseases are real. Vaccinations WORK. Vaccine safety continues to be monitored and proven.

Yes.

Vaccines DO work.

Does the anti-vaccine camp really believe that smallpox, polio, measles, whooping cough, etc… etc…, each of which at one point in history contributed SIGNIFICANTLY to infant, child, and adult mortality, just vanished all by their lonesome?

To not recognize the correlation in the decline of these diseases with the increased use of disease-specific vaccinations is not only ludicrous, it’s irresponsible.

To be fair (and protect myself from the nutcases who want to attack pharmaceutical companies & vaccines) I would be irresponsible to claim that all vaccines are harmless. Aside from the fact that some people contract a mild form of the disease they are being vaccinated against there are many historical examples of vaccines that were stopped or modified because they were not tolerated as well as expected.

For instance, the early oral form of the polio vaccine was replaced by the injected form because of adverse side effects.

All that said … vaccinations have made many hugely contagious diseases almost obsolete.

While this last thought seems crazy to even type … being rational takes work, education, and a conscious decision to avoid making hasty inferences. I guess much like these infectious diseases themselves (which have virtually been beaten by decades of effort to vaccinate people) irrational thinking lingers just below the surface waiting for us to let down our guard.

All that said.

This is a crazy issue.

An “anti-vaccine’ camp? Really? C’mon.

Parents step up to the plate and get your kids vaccinated.

Vaccines do work.

a sign the apocalypse is upon us

December 16th, 2011

Well.

If this following report isn’t a sign that the apocalypse is upon us, well, then I don’t know what will prove it:

A defense attorney for accused child molester Jerry Sandusky has claimed that the former Penn State assistant football coach showered with young boys in order to teach them how to wash properly.

In an interview with WHTM-TV in Harrisburg, Pa., attorney Karl Rominger attempted to explain the 67-year-old Sandusky’s admitted habit of showering with boys after football camps that he ran through his charity for disadvantaged children, The Second Mile.

“Some of these kids don’t have basic hygiene skills,” Rominger said. “Teaching a person to shower at the age of 12 or 14 sounds strange to some people, but people who work with troubled youth will tell you there are a lot of juvenile delinquents and people who are dependent who have to be taught basic life skills like how to put soap on their body.”

Sandusky has admitted in televised interviews that he showered with boys, but denies the behavior was sexual in nature.

Other options the lawyer considered stating:

-          TSA security training

-          aliens

-          the devil made him do it

-          all accusers are lying because they simply want the fame from talking about how they had been molested to as many people as possible (oh … they used this one)

-          they were really little girls (oh … that is illegal too)

-          the truth (not an option)

anyway.

The apocalypse can be the only explanation I can think of for any lawyer thinking anyone would believe any aspect of this bunch of bullhockey.

It is an insult to our intelligence.

And possibly a reflection of how far lawyers will go to stretch the possibility of truth under the guise of ‘innocence.’

Silly. Stupid in fact.

And if people end up believing this … well … yes … the Apocalypse has arrived.

did nothing part 3 (and last part)

November 11th, 2011

Ok.

This will be my last post on this Penn State sexual abuse issue (not a promise on the last but I am so sickened by the entire situation as well as how portions of it are being handled I have to stop).

First.

If you are unclear on where you stand or how you are thinking about this issue go read the Grand Jury Presentment.

But if you do … hold on to something … or have the stiffest drink available.

It is brutal reading.

Absolutely brutal reading.

I do not suggest anyone faint of heart reading it.

I can guarantee you will be affected by it.

And I can guarantee that there will be a number of people peripheral, but absolutely not responsible, to this entire situation who will read this and feel excruciating pain of conscious for not recognizing what was actualy happening and doing something. Yes. Many many people on the fringe of this situation are going to have some sleepless nights.

And I feel for those people because now I wonder … I wonder if at some point in my life I have seen something similar … and just not recognized it for what it was.

No.  I am not talking about the clearly graphic uncomfortable situations that you will read if you have the fortitude to read the grand jury testament.

I am talking about the nuances in seeing a sex offender, who from all aspects is no one you would ever suspect, doing ‘odd things’ which these people in hindsight are going to have nightmares over.

Regardless.

Absolutely brutal reading.

Here is the link:

http://www.freep.com/assets/freep/pdf/C4181508116.PDF

(you can also access it thru scribd)

Second.

There is a clip from FoxSports News which seems to encapsulate all aspects of this maddening media spectacle. It has three people in the interview … the commentator, a lawyer and Jason Whitlock.

The news commentator gets so upset by the end she just closes the interview (and rightfully so).

The lawyer is … well … a lawyer.  And someone in that industry should recognize that this interview is a prime example of why we hate lawyers. I know I hate him. He spewed legalese and culpability crap.  And to some extent he is saying all the correct things. But he is not correct. While he is a lawyer he is a person … maybe even a father … and he is an adult that has a responsibility to our youth … even if he doesn’t have children.

Jason Whitlock, who knows sports as well as anyone out there, and a known rant-er is actually quite calm. But he reminds us that this isn’t about sports.  This is about moral responsibility.

Here is the link:

http://msn.foxsports.com/video/college-football?vid=52e16ca9-37f3-4fbb-a964-b95539abd210&from=foxsports/college-football/home_gallery

Ok.

I am done.

I started on the first day out of shock that someone could stand by and do nothing.

I end on this day because the grand jury report is sickening.

And removes all doubt.

And reminds us all that this shit happens … and it happens all around us (1 in 4 girls, 1 in 6 boys).

And it should remind us that we adults have a responsibility to children.

To protect them.

In this case we have failed our children.

And we should all be bothered by this.

did nothing part 2

November 9th, 2011


Within the horror of the seeming extent of the sexual abuse scenario at Penn State there is a breadth of absurdity.

The absurdity of “taking sides.”

People.

There are no sides to this. Just one side.

Wrongness. Moral responsibility.  Protecting children.

And yet a large number of people are focused on “saving Joe Paterno.”  Or “should he lose his job or not.”

Frankly. I don’t give a shit.

Someone losing their job seems little solace to the boy seen in the shower with the abuser.  I am guessing because this is big time sports and a big time legend a lot of people are losing sight of the issue.

Children were sexually abused.

And adults did nothing.

How much have people lost sight of the issue?

Last night there was a rally at Penn State.

“I believe in Joe Paterno!” a girl screamed.

“I believe in Joe Paterno!” the crowd echoed.

“I believe in Joe Paterno!” she screamed again.

“I believe in Joe Paterno!”

And at the same place this rally took place a woman, with her 10 month old baby and her husband had sat simply holding a sign reminding anyone she could that evil can triumph when good men stay silent.

If that doesn’t express the absurdity of what is happening I don’t know what could.

A rally celebrating the man who had stayed as silent as anyone.

Penn State is now becoming the poster child of one shaped by silence.

I don’t think Jo Pa is a bad man.  I don’t believe he is a coward (as one columnist has suggested). I don’t really think anything about him other than he is probably a good man … who remained silent when he shouldn’t have.

Anyway.

This scenario isn’t about one man other than Sandusky (who is charged with 21 felony counts for allegedly abusing eight victims over a period of 15 years and a possible ninth victim came forward to police after Sandusky’s arrest).

This scenario isn’t bigger than the kids (they are the victims here just to remind everyone).

This scenario is about silence and doing nothing.

Some facts.

-          One in 4 girls will be sexually abused.

-          One in 6 boys will be sexually abused.

The numbers are stunning.

Stunningly horrible.

And silence only permits those numbers to remain as is.

The only thing I ask of those who reminded silent, those who did nothing …

“if you hadn’t, if you had spoken, if you had done something … do you think it is possible one other boy, or girl, wouldn’t have been sexually abused?

And if the answer is yes.

I guess the bigger question to them is … “don’t you think knowing that would have made it worth doing something?”

I imagine nothing compares to what a sexually abused child lives with for the rest of their lives.

Those who remained silent, who did nothing, have to live with that for the rest of their lives.

Enlightened Conflict